Country Profiles Search   
1. Stakeholder perspective: Who participates, who doesn't? 2. Process perspective: How has participation been realized beyond the strategy development? 3. Framework perspective: What are key factors determining the impact of participation? 4. Resources: Statistcal Data, Documents and Links

ALBANIA
Albania
1. Stakeholder perspective: Who participates, who doesn't?

1.1 Government and parliament: Within government the Ministry of Finance takes the lead in the PRS process through its so called GPRS Technical Secretariat. The Inter-Ministerial Steering Committee, headed by the Prime Minister, supervises the process of formulation of the PRSP (National Strategy for Socio-Economic Development, NSSED, thereinafter also synonym Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy, GPRS). The Committee consists of members of the Interministerial Economic Policy Committee and respectively one representative of donor community and civil society. This steering committee in turn set up a GPRS Working Group, which under the presiding MoF coordinates and controls the operative activities of the strategy development. The group is comprised of the department heads of various sector ministries (MoF, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education etc.). Among these, the MoF chairs the GPRS Working Group. In order to utilize existing local capacities in the formulation of the PRSP, the working group assigned the following two NGOs to serve as advisers in preparation and drafting of the poverty reduction strategy: The Institute for Contemporary Studies and the Institute for Fiscal Education, which, among other things, organized consultations with parliament, local government and private sector. Line-ministries are primarily involved through the GPRS Working Group as well as several working groups, the so called. Sector Technical Advisory Groups (STWG).The National Assembly, however, is only marginally integrated into the PRS process: Only few of its delegates participated in the consultative meetings, which took place during PRS formulation; even a half-day long workshop, explicitly aimed at the inclusion of parliamentarians in the PRS process was poorly attended. Moreover, political parties, too, did not participate in PRS formulation. But with the launch of NSSED implementation, participation of members of Parliament was enhanced.

1.2 Non-state actors: Civil society participation in the PRS process was-and still is-primarily organized through attendance of the Civil Society Advisory Groups (CSAG) and National Society Advisory Group (NCSAG).The CSAGs are made up of 10-15 civil society representatives, thus, providing the basis for discussion and development of proposals for policy-formulation. These groups select 4-5 representatives to be delegated to the four STWGs Agriculture, Health, Education, and Labor and Social issues. Members of both CSAGs and STWGs in turn participated in meetings of the GPRS Working Group. Moreover, every CSAG selects two members designated to participate in the NCSAG. The latter combines representatives of diverse civil society organizations and groups, the private sector, local governments, and other areas of society with the goal to comment on the PRSP-which in fact it did in case of every draft version of the strategy. Furthermore, two consultations with representatives of the private sectors (among them The Union of Chambers of Industry and Trade of Albania, Council of Albanian Agro-Business, Albanian Banker`s Association) were carried out.

1.3 Donors: Numerous bi- and multilateral donors financially supported the preparation of the strategy, the participatory process, and the consultations with stakeholders. (Government of Albania 2001: xiii). A GPRS Core Donor Group was established, making the monitoring of the PRS process its business. The group consisted of delegates from Canada, Greece, EU, IMF, Italy the Netherlands, OSCE, Great Britain, UNDP, UNICEF, USAID, World Bank, and Germany. Initially, meetings to discuss the drafts of PRSP were held quite frequently, the group now-during implementation-meets once a month to observe and debate the progress made during PRS implementation. Additionally, donors installed a Technical Working Group to foster coordination of their aid.


2. Process perspective: How has participation been realized beyond the strategy development? Zum Seitenanfang
 

2.1 Participation in PRS implementation (overall perspective): At large, hardly any progress was made during NSSED implementation: political frictions led to three changes of government in 2002 and, thus, accounted for a precarious political situation. The JSA of states that the Albanian government did little to deepen and institutionalize participation of civil society in NSSED updating. Consequently, on side of civil society, the lack of institutionalization and sustainability of participation was lamented; in addition, CS indicates that the individual processes were oftentimes uncoordinated and ill organized, following a rather ad hoc approach. By means of the latter, civil society argues the processes were poorly or sometimes not at all aligned with the PRS processes. Despite consultations and public relations, the bigger part of the Albanian public and local governments were not sufficiently familiar with the PRS and its processes.

2.2 Participation in Policy Reforms linked to the PRS (specific perspective): No specific information available.

2.3 Participation in PRS Monitoring: In 2002, M&E units were set up in a total of 12 ministries and their tasks and structures defined. Civil society is involved through its membership in the technical sector working group; soon after the launch of the M&E phase, CS developed a number of proposals to build capacity for CSO involvement in monitoring However, detailed information on the operationalization of societal participation in the M&E process are owing to date. Within the Labor and Social Ministry a so-called "Poverty Center" is to be set up; the GPRS Technical Secretariat of the MoF acts the part of the institutional coordinators in order to ensure transparent and efficient monitoring.

2.4 Participation in PRS Revision: The government intends to invite CSOs to join the annual review of the PRSP process, and add their independent report to the annual PRSP progress report (Coyle/Evans 2003: 15). The first NSSED-APR was elaborated with the help of local consultants and eventually presented by the government in 2003. A year prior, consultations regarding the compilation of the Medium Term Programs 2003-2006 as well as the APR were carried out; in total 16 nation-wide consultations had been organized at national and local between January and April of 2003. These consultations during the fabrication of the Progress Report included civil society, the private sector, local governments, parliament, and donors. Participants discussed problems during PRS implementation as well as progresses made and challenges to be accepted in the course of the process. Revision was concluded in a big national conference in April 2003. According to the Albanian government, results of these consultations were incorporated into the Progress Report for Implementation.


3. Framework perspective: What are key factors determining the impact of participation? Zum Seitenanfang
 

3.1 Structures: CSAGs, the NCSAG, STWGs as well as the Working Group are first elements of the institutionalization of non-state stakeholder participation. Thus, the Albanian government managed to integrate civil society actors into the PRS process. The NCSAG significantly added to the fact that experts of target groups re integrated into the STWGs and, therefore, their concern have been fed into the PRS process. Undoubtedly, the institutionalization of participation is promoted by the creation of specific working groups; however, civil society input in structural and macroeconomic matters was rather limited because it was not represented in the fundamental working groups such as Trade and Economy.

3.2 Legitimacy: Civil society actors lament the variable degree to which the various stakeholders participated in the PRS process: For instance, rural NGOs are hardly integrated into the process, while international donors and international NGOs are said to have great influence on the process. Domestic NGOs play a growing role within the development context of Albania. While there a many reputable NGOs that do good work, there is a reason for caution toward others. NGOs are often viewed by the public as a means of influential people to make a living, often at international levels of income, which are considerably higher than domestic levels. There are many former ministers and deputy ministers who became directors of various non-governmental organizations, many of the former politicians being in the opposition party. To date, there appears to be few if any rural NGOs. Many domestic NGOs work at the municipal level to arbitrate disputes among the communities and the governments and offer training to local NGOs and local governments (Gamisonia undated: 5).

3.3 Capacity: The absence of a well-organized and well-established civil society as well as lack of participatory traditions hampered the active involvement of non-state stakeholders in the PRS process. Moreover, Albanian NGOs lack of sufficient funding and staff, which limits their capacity to act. Another problem is the shortage of time: most often civil society actors simply had not enough time to acquaint themselves with the different drafts of the PRS prior to the consultations. In order to overcome capacity deficiencies, the Albanian NGOs Forum (ANGOF) was founded recently.


4. Resources: Statistcal Data, Documents and Links Zum Seitenanfang
 

4.1 Statistical data

a. Developmental status

Human Development Index (UNDP) (2004)
http://hdr.undp.org/statistics/data/cty/cty_f_ALB.html
Rank 65 of 177
"Freedom in the World" country ratings (Freedom House) (2004)
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2004/countryratings/albania.htm
"partly free"
Worldwide Press Freedom Index (Reporters Without Boarders) (2004)
http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=11715
Rank 50 of 167
Index of Economic Freedom (Wall Street Journal/Heritage Foundation) (2005)
http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/country.cfm?id=Albania
Rank 67 of 155

b. Indebteness

Albania is not participating in the HIPC II initiative. For more information on Albania's debt status see:

Paris Club - Albania debt treatments
http://www.clubdeparis.org/en/countries/countries.php?PAY_ISO_ID=AL&submit=ok

World Bank: Albania Estimated Debt Service Payments
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,...,00.html?countrylist=ALB

c. Further statistical resources

Albania Institute of Statistics (Instat)
http://www.instat.gov.al/

World Bank: Albania Data & Statistics
http://www.worldbank.org.al/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/ALBANIAEXTN/0,,...,00.html

4.2 Important documents

a. Official PRS-related documents

IMF/IDA (2004): Albania. Joint Staff Assessment of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Annual Progress Report. June 18.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/Albania_PRSP_APR_JSA.PDF

IMF/IDA (2003): Albania. Joint Staff Assessment of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Annual Progress Report. June 13.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/Albania_JSA_PRSP_APR.pdf

IMF/IDA (2002a): Albania. Joint Staff Assessment of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper. May 28.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/Albania_JSA_of_PRSP_Supplement.pdf

Republic of Albania / Ministry of Finance (2004): Progress Report on Implementation of the National Strategy for Socio-Economic Development during 2003. Objectives and Long Term Vision. April.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/Albania_PRSP_APR.PDF

Republic of Albania / The Council of Ministers (2003): National strategy for socio-economic development (NSSED). Progress report for implementation 2002, objectives and long term vision of the NSSED, priority action plan 2003. Tirana, May 8.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/Albania_PRSP_ProgRep.pdf

Republic of Albania / Ministry of Finance (2002): Supplement to the National Strategy For Socio-Economic Development (GPRS). 20 May.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/Albania_PRSP_Supplement.pdf

Republic of Albania / Council of Ministers (2001): National Strategy for Socio-Economic Development. Tirana, November.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/Albania_PRSP.pdf

Republic of Albania (2000): Albania Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper. May 3.
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/files/albania_iprsp.pdf

For the most recent official PRSP documents see
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/EXTPRS/0,,...,00.html

b. Major donor-related documents

European Commission: Albania Country Strategy Paper 2002-2006
http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/see/albania/csp/02_06_en.pdf

IMF (2005): Albania: Sixth Review Under the Extended Arrangement Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility. Washington D.C., August 3.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2005/cr05267.pdf

UNDP Albania (2005): Country Evaluation. Assessment of Development Results. UNDP Albania 2002-2004.
http://intra.undp.org.al/ext/elib/download/?id=699&name=Country%2DEval%2D2005%2DEnglish%2Epdf

UNDP (2005): Advancing Development through Sub-national MDG Reports: a case study of Albania.
http://www.undp.org/mdg/goodpractices/Albania-casestudy.pdf

World Bank: Albania Country Assistance Strategy (CAS)
http://www.worldbank.org.al/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/ALBANIAEXTN/0,,...,00.html

For further donor-related strategy documents see http://www.countryanalyticwork.net

4.3 Reports and analyses

a. PRSP-related publications

Bojö, Jan et al. (2004): Environment in Poverty Reduction Strategies and Poverty Reduction Support Credits. World Bank, Environment Department, Environmental Economics Series, Paper No. 102, Washington D.C., November. (includes data on Albania)
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2004/12/16/...PAPER0EDP0102.pdf

Bojö, Jan/Rama Chandra Reddy (2003): Status and Evolution of Environmental Priorities in the Poverty Reduction Strategies. An Assessment of Fifty Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. World Bank, Environment Department, Environmental Economics Series, Paper No. 93, Washington D.C., November. (includes data on Albania)
http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/.../StatusandEvolutionofEnvironmentalPrioritiesinthePovertyReductionStrategies.pdf

Caillods, F./J. Hallak (2004): Education and PRSPs. A review of experiences. A review undertaken with the support of DFID, UNESCO, Interational Institute of Educational Planning, Paris. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.unesco.org/iiep/PDF/pubs/PRSP.pdf

Coyle, Erin/Evans, Alison (2003): PRSP Synthesis Note 6. Experience with PRSPs in tranisitions countries. PRSP Monitoring & Synthesis Project, Synthesis Note 6. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.prspsynthesis.org/synthesis6.pdf

Dewachter, Sara (2005): The Participation Conditionality under Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: The Joint Staff Assessment -experience. University of Antwerp, Institute of Development Policy and Management, IDPM-UA discussion paper 2005-6, April. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.ua.ac.be/main.asp?c=*IOBE&n=4267&ct=001595&e=o74918

Egulu, Lawrence (2004): Trade Union Participation in the PRSP Process. World Bank, Social Protection Unit, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, Washington D.C., August. (includes Albania case study)
http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/HDNet/hddocs.nsf/0/7a0f881805ec10bc85256ee600757c0d/$FILE/0417.pdf

European Network on Debt and Development (EURODAD) (2002): Private Sector Development - Pro-poor, or merely Poor, Service Delivery? Brussels, April. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.eurodad.org/uploadstore/cms/docs/eurodad_privatesectordevelopment.pdf

Fox, James W. (2003): Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: Review of Private Sector Participation. USAID Development Information Services (DIS), Washington D.C., October 31. (includes data on Albania)
http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNACU918.pdf

Gamisonia, Rostom (undated): PRSP Rapid Assessment in Georgia and Albania, NGO Working Group on the World Bank.
http://www.prsp-watch.de/laenderprofile/albanien/PRSP_Rapid_Assessment_by_Rostom_Gamisonia.doc

GTZ (2004a): National Monitoring of Sustainable Poverty Reduction Strategies / PRSPs. Volume 1: Main Report. Eschborn. (based on Albania case study)
http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/en-prsp-monitoring.pdf

GTZ (2004b): National Monitoring of Sustainable Poverty Reduction Strategies / PRSPs. Volume 2: Country Study Albania. Eschborn.
http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/en-prsp-monitoring-country-study-albania.pdf

Heidel, Klaus (2004): Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers - blind to the rights of the (working) child? The (I-)PRSPs' perception of child labour. A problem outline and annotated collection of source material. Kindernothilfe/Werkstatt Ökonomie, Duisburg/Heidelberg, March. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.kindernothilfe.org/downloads/ka_prsp_mar_20044.pdf

Hewitt, Adrian/Ian Gillson (2003): Review of the Trade and Poverty Content in PRSPs and Loan-Related Documents. Report commissioned by Christian Aid, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London. (includes Albania case study)
http://www.odi.org.uk/iedg/projects/christian_aid_paper.pdf

High-Level Forum on the Health MDGs (2004): MDG-Orientated Sector and Poverty Reduction Strategies: Lessons from Experience in Health. Abuja, December. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.hlfhealthmdgs.org/Documents/MDGorientedPRSPs-Final.pdf

Holmes, Malcom/Alison Evans (2003): Implementing Medium Term Expenditure Frameworks in a PRSP Context: A Synthesis of Eight Country Studies. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, Discussion Draft, November. (based on Albania case study)
http://www.odi.org.uk/PPPG/cape/publications/MTEF%20Synthesis%20Final%20Nov%2003.pdf

IMF/IDA (2002b): Review of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) Approach: Early Experience with Interim PRSPs and Full PRSPs. Prepared by the Staffs of the IMF and World Bank, Washington DC., March 26. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.imf.org/external/np/prspgen/review/2002/032602a.pdf

International Labour Organisation (ILO) (2002): Disability and Poverty Reduction Strategies. How to ensure that access of persons with disabilities to decent and productive work is part of the PRSP process. Discussion Paper, Geneva, November.
http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/skills/disability/download/discpaper.pdf

Joint Donor PRSP Training (2004): PRSP-related coordination challenges in Europe; the case of Albania. Preliminary draft, May.
http://www.hlspinstitute.org/files/project/13865/Albania.pdf

Kanani, Alma (2002): Case Study Albania. Linking the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework and th GPRS. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), Centre for Aid & Public Expenditure, London.
http://www.odi.org.uk/PPPG/cape/publications/Albania%20MTEFand%20PRSP%20Case%20Study2.pdf

Kashta, Anesti (2002): Albania Growth & Poverty Reduction Strategy. Civil Society Involvement in Setting the Priorities.
http://www2.gtz.de/poverty-conference/dokumente/results/monitoring/Anesti%20Kashta%20-%20Albania.doc

Killick, Tony (2002): The 'Streamlining' of IMF Conditionality: Aspirations, Reality and Repercussions. A report for the Department for International Development (DFID), Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, April. (based on Albania case study)
http://www.odi.org.uk/iedg/Projects/imf_conditionality.pdf

Ladd, Paul (2003): Too hot to handle? The absence of trade policy from PRSPs. Christian Aid, April. (includes data on Albania)
http://christian-aid.org.uk/indepth/0304toohot/toohot.pdf

Lucas, Henry/David Evans/Katherine Pasteur (2004): Research on the current state of PRS monitoring systems. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Discussion Paper 382, Brighton, December. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/bookshop/dp/dp382.pdf

Mancellari, Ahmet/Sybi Hida (2005): Macroeconomic Policy Choices for Growth and Poverty Reduction. The Case of Albania. The North-South Institute, Policy Brief, May.
http://www.nsi-ins.ca/english/pdf/PRSP_Albania.pdf

Marcus, Rachel/John Wilkinson (2002): Whose Poverty Matters? Vulnerability, Social Protection and PRSPs. Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre (CHIP), Working Paper No. 1. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.chronicpoverty.org/pdfs/19Marcus_Wilkinson.pdf

ODI (2005): Linking Policies and Budgets: Implementing Medium Term Expenditure Frameworks in a PRSP Context. Overseas Development Institute, ODI Briefing Paper, London, June. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/briefing/bp_june05_MTEF.pdf

OECD/DAC (2004): Role of Infrastructure in Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lessons Learned from PRSPs of 33 Countries. DAC Network on Poverty Reduction, Berlin, October 27-29. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/60/33919674.pdf

OECD/DAC (2003): Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) as of January 2003. OECD, Global Forum on Knowledge Economy, Paris, 4-5 March. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2003doc.nsf/0/9e9362c4f76af209c1256cd700559927/$FILE/JT00139891.PDF

Schmidt, Mary Beth (2002): Review of the Integration of Social Funds With Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers and Country Assistance Strategies. Consultant's Report to Human Development Network, World Bank Group, Washington D.C, May 31. (includes data on Albania)
http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/HDNet/HDDocs.nsf/.../SIFs%20in%20PRSPs%20and%20CASs.pdf

The Carter Center (2000): Carter Center to Launch Development Strategy Initiative in Albania.
http://www.cartercenter.org/viewdoc.asp?docID=941&submenu=news

World Bank Operations Evaluation Department (OED) (2004): OED Review of the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) Process. Albania Case Study. Corporate Evaluation and Methods Group, Washington D.C., July 6.
http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/oed/oeddoclib.nsf/...FILE/prsp_albania.pdf

World Bank Operations Evaluation Department (OED)/IMF Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) (2005): The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative. Findings from 10 Country Case Studies of World Bank and IMF Support. Washington D.C. (includes Albania case study)
http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/oed/oeddoclib.nsf/.../prsp_country_case_studies.pdf

World Bank (2005): Poverty Reduction Support Credits: A Stocktaking. Operations Policy and Country Services (OPCS), Washington D.C., June 24. (includes data on Albania)
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PROJECTS/.../PRSC%20Stocktaking%20_06-28-05_.pdf

World Bank (2004a): A Review of Poverty Reduction Strategies - Do They Empower Stakeholders? Work in progress - draft, Poverty Reduction Group (PREM), Washington D.C., January. (includes Albania case study)
http://povlibrary.worldbank.org/library/view/15201

World Bank (2004b): Poverty Reduction Strategies: Their Importance for Disability. Disability and Development Team, Washington D.C., July 7.

World Bank (2004c): A Review of Population, Reproductive Health, and Adolescent Health & Development in Poverty Reduction Strategies. Population and Reproductive Health Cluster/Health Nutrition and Population Central Unit, Washington D.C., August. (includes data on Albania)
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPRH/Publications/20262402/PRSP%20report%20-%20Aug%2031%202004.pdf

World Bank (2002a): Aligning Assistance for Development Effectiveness. Promising Country Experience. Comprehensive Development Framework Secretariat/Operations Policy and Country Services (OPCS), Washington D.C., February. (includes Albania case study)
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/CDF/Resources/Alignment.pdf

World Bank (2002b): Participation and Civic Engagement in Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRSP). Good Practice & Lessons Learned - The Case of Albania. Participation and Civic Engagement Group, Washington D.C.
http://www.worldbank.org/participation/ALBANIA.pdf

World Development Movement (2005): Democracy and the Poverty Reduction Strategy process: Country cases. May. (includes Albania case study).
http://www.wdm.org.uk/democracy/prsp/prsp.pdf

World Health Organization (2004): PRSPs: Their Significance for Health: second synthesis report. Geneva. (includes data on Albania)
http://www.who.int/hdp/en/prspsig.pdf

b. Background reading

American Bar Association/Central European and Eurasian Law Initative (ABB/CEELI) (2004): Judicial Reform Index for Albania. Volume II. February.
http://www.abanet.org/ceeli/publications/jri/jri_alb_2.pdf

American Bar Association/Central European and Eurasian Law Initative (ABA/CEELI) (2001): Judicial Reform Index for Albania. December.
http://www.abanet.org/ceeli/publications/jri/jri_albania.pdf

Freedom House (ed.) (undated): Albania, in: same, Nations in Transit 1999-2000, p. 44-67.
http://www1.oecd.org/daf/SPAIcom/pdf/Nations-in-Transit-Alb.pdf

Hoxha, Artan (2002): Local Self-Government and Decentralization. Case of Albania. History, Reforms and Challenges, Reforms and Challenges, Tirana, January.
http://www.cespi.it/STOCCHIERO/Ascod-Albania/paperHoxhaDecentrAlbania6.PDF

Human Rights Watch (2002): The Cost of Speech. Violations of Media Freedom in Albania, in: Human Rights Watch, Vol. 14(5), June.
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/albania/albania0602.pdf

Issues of the Implementation of the Law "On Non-profitable Organizations". First National Conference "Development Issues of NPOs in Albania", September 2002.
http://www.usemb-tirana.rpo.at/calendar/pdfs/en/...LAW%20on%20NPOs.pdf

NPO-State Relations. Conference "Problems of Non-Profitable Organizations (NPO) in Albania", September 23-24 2002.
http://www.usemb-tirana.rpo.at/calendar/pdfs/en/...(NPO)%20in%20Albania.pdf

Stability Pact Anti-Corruption Initiative (2001): Empowering Civil Society in the Fight Against Corruption in South East Europe - Albania: Civil Society Assessment Report. SPAI Regional Conference on Civil Society.
http://topics.developmentgateway.org/civic/rc/filedownload.do~itemId=316595

UNDP Albania: Albania and the Millennium Development Goals
http://www.mdg.org.al/

4.4 Links to stakeholders involved

a. PRSP

Albanian Ministry of Finance
http://www.minfin.gov.al/skzhes/skzhes.htm

b. Civil society

Albanian Center for Human Rights
http://www.achr.org and http://www.human-rights.net/ACHR/index.html

Albanian Human Rights Group
http://www.ahrg.org/

Information and Research Centre for Children's Rights in Albania
http://www.crca.org.al/Irccra.html

Network Women's Programm (NWP)
http://www.soros.org/initiatives/women

Orthodox Autocephalous Church of Albania
http://www.orthodoxalbania.org/

Partners for Democratic Change
http://www.partnersglobal.org/centers/centers_albania.html

Tirana Women's International Group
http://twigalbania.tripod.com/twig/

Women's Center Tirana
http://www.icc-al.org/~women/WomenCenter.htm

Directory of Development Organizations (national / international)
http://www.devdir.org/files/Albania.PDF

c. Donors / International actors

Aid Harmonization & Alignment Iniatiative - Albania country profile
http://www.aidharmonization.org/ah-cla/ah-browser/index-abridged?master=master&rgn_cnt=al

International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Albania country profile
http://www.imf.org/external/country/ALB/index.htm

World Bank - Albania country profile
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/ALBANIA...,00.html

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) - Albania country office
http://www.undp.org.al/

Directory of Development Organizations (national / international)
http://www.devdir.org/files/Albania.PDF

4.5 General country information

Development Gateway
http://www.developmentgateway.com/countryprofile/?country_iso=al

International Crisis Group (ICG) - Albania country profile
http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=1241&l=1

Freedom House - Albania country profile
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2003/countryratings/albania.htm

4.6 General links that also provide country-specific information

European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad)
http://www.eurodad.org/

International Monetary Fund (IMF)
http://www.imf.org/

The World Bank Group
http://www.worldbank.org/

Paris Club
http://www.clubdeparis.org/en/index.php


Source : www.prsp-watch.de (September 2005)

© German Version: VENRO
© English Version: The World Bank Group & VENRO. The first part of this country profile (analysis excluding information on ressources) has been comissioned by the World Bank, Social Development Department, Participation and Civic Engagement Group and produced by a team of researchers under the coordination of Prof. Dr. Walter Eberlei, University of Applied Sciences Düsseldorf. Other team members were Dr. Thomas Siebold (Hamburg), Bettina Führmann (Düsseldorf/Bochum), Christina-Maria Kreibich (Duisburg) and Arne Wunder (Bielefeld/Duisburg). VENRO has been granted the right to post it. The country profile largely draws on information from a previous German version that was commissioned by VENRO. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank or VENRO. VENRO is the Association of German development non-governmental organisations (www.venro.org).

top